This competency assessment assesses the following Outcome(s):
CM220M2-1: Construct logical arguments.
Assessment Introduction and Instructions: Create a persuasive, problem-solving thesis statement and evaluate the effectiveness of that thesis using the rhetorical situation and the rhetorical triangle.
For the Module 2 Assessment, you will complete a chart to help you develop ideas about the argument for change you’d like your community to adopt. Download the file, save it with a name like LastNameCM220Module2Assessment, and fill in the chart. You will then submit your completed chart to the Module 2 Assessment Dropbox.
In Part I, you will create a persuasive thesis statement, identify the major and minor premise in that thesis statement, and discuss the common ground you believe you share with your audience. Make sure the thesis is concise (1–2 sentences) and clearly expresses a persuasive argument that offers a solution to a problem in your community or workplace. You may use the three-point thesis format you learned in the Module readings (solution plus three reasons). As you research your topic in later Modules, you may decide to eliminate one or two of these reasons.
In Part II, describe your purpose (what is the problem you want to solve and how do you plan to solve it?), audience (key stakeholders) of your community, and the setting of your community (In other words, where does this problem take place?). You will provide details about whom you need to convince to bring about change. As you consider your audience, imagine the small group or the person who has the ability to make the desired change. Then, explain your community’s setting. Describe elements of the community that may affect the problem. For instance, if you are addressing the issue of affordable housing in Southern California, you may want to discuss the large population and lack of housing options in this community.
Finally, in Part III, you will evaluate your argument using the three rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos). Aim for a minimum of 5–7 sentences per section. Use complete sentences and offer specific examples.
Be sure to discuss rival hypotheses your proposal might face and how you would address these. You will also need to identify and cite at least one source you will use to support your claims and mention additional research that you may need to conduct. Finally, you will consider rhetorical strategies that you can use to connect with your audience and will identify one logical fallacy that you will want to avoid. See the Module 2 readings for an overview of several logical fallacies
While you will be using a chart to complete the assignment, be sure to include a title and references page in APA format and cite any sources in APA style.
Minimum Submission Requirements
This Assessment should be in the format of the included chart / worksheet.
Include a persuasive, problem-solving thesis statement.
Identify the underlying assumption and common ground that can be established.
Identify the purpose, audience, and setting for your argument.
Discuss how you will use the three types of rhetorical appeals (Logos, Ethos, and Pathos).
Include a title page in APA format.
References to sources should be cited in APA style both in-text and on a separate references page
Responses to questions are in complete sentences that are clear, concise, complete, and correct
Responses do not have significant errors in grammar, mechanics, or punctuation.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|